Legal Opinion

Daab v. Ritter

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 9, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mubphy

Plaintiffs instituted this suit in the circuit court of Monroe county to recover damages in an action for fraud and deceit. That court sustained defendant’s motion in the nature of a demurrer to the amended complaint and the following record entry was made, ‘ ‘ Said motion in nature of demurrer to dismiss amended complaint so on file and extended, to amended complaint is thereupon argued by respective counsel and heard by the court. Motion to dismiss sustained. Plaintiff, on oral motion therefor, is granted leave to file second amended complaint within ten days thereafter.”

Later plaintiffs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chicago Portrait Co. v. Chicago Crayon Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. City of Alton v. HeidrickIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Westcott v. KinneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Duncan v. National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. O'DONNELL v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  2. Prange v. City of MarionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  3. Reynolds v. WangelinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  4. Anderson v. SamuelsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API