Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McBRXDE, J.- —

Taking up the first assignment, we are clearly of the opinion that the evidence of the witnesses in regard to defendant’s apparent state of intoxication is admissible: Underhill on Evidence (1 ed.), p. 168; 16 C. J. 759. In American Bauxite Co. v. Dunn, 120 Ark. 1 (178 S. W. 934, Ann. Cas. 1917C, 625, 626), the court used the following language:

“Whether a person is drunk or sober, or to what extent he is affected by intoxication is frequently determined by the direct answers of those who have seen and know the person than by their description of his conduct; Whether a person is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  2. State v. EdmunsonOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  3. American Bauxite Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. KozukonisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1965
  2. State v. RandOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API