Dozier v. Pillot
Texas Supreme Court
Error from Harris. Tried below before Hon. James Masterson.
1Opinion of the Court
GAINES, Associate Justice.
This suit was brought by appellants, This as husband and wife, to recover of appellee damages for the alleged conversion by him of certain personal property belonging to the wife.
The facts, as disclosed by the evidence upon the trial, were that on the 5th of February, 1886, Pauline Dozier, joined by her husband, executed a deed of trust upon the property to secure Pillot in payment of a promissory note for $600 and interest, executed the same day and due one year after date. The trustee was empowered to sell upon default; but the mortgage provided that until default…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Higgins v. ShepardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Moran Oil & Gas Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- McVea v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Atkinson v. LeonardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- McAlister v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.