Legal Opinion · Dissent

Johnson v. Hall

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 1, 1978No. [No. 1, September Term, 1978.]Published

1DissentMurphy, C. J.

The majority today holds that Dr. Johnson’s will does not explicitly direct the payment of all estate and inheritance taxes out of the residuary estate, and as a consequence the federal estate tax must be apportioned among all the legatees. Because I think that Articles FIRST and TENTH, when read together, sufficiently express Dr. Johnson’s intention to direct against apportionment under Maryland Code (1974), § 11-109 (k) of the Estates and Trusts Article, I respectfully dissent.

To determine the effect of a tax clause in a will, the Court must first ascertain the testatrix’s intent. As Chief…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bouse v. HutzlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  2. Bolstad v. Wells Fargo Bank American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  3. In Re Ogburn's EstateWyoming Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Starr v. WatrousSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  5. Beals v. MagenisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API