Legal Opinion

Tatum v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 11, 1996No. 2-94-400-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAY, Justice.

Appellant George Edward Tatum was indicted for the aggravated sexual assault of his daughter and indecency with a child. Appellant pled guilty to the indecency charge and not guilty to the aggravated sexual assault. A jury found appellant guilty of both offenses and assessed punishment at 65 years’ confinement for the aggravated sexual assault and 20 years’ confinement for indecency with a child. On appeal, appellant argues that the trial court erred during the punishment phase of the trial by allowing the State to introduce privileged communications made by appellant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DuffyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Ex Parte CruzCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Ex Parte FeltonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Briddle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Ex Parte LangleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Foreman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  2. McAllister v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. George Foreman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  4. James Panchol v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2013
  5. Morris Holder v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API