Legal Opinion

City of Meridian v. Hodge

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1994No. 91-CA-1165PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

632 So.2d 1309 (1994)

CITY OF MERIDIAN

v.

Charles David HODGE and Elizabeth D. Hodge.

No. 91-CA-1165.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

February 24, 1994.

Lawrence Primeaux, Goldman & Primeaux, Meridian, for appellant.

Henry Palmer, Palmer, Wright & Williamson, Meridian, for appellee.

En Banc.

BANKS, Justice, for the Court:

This appeal presents the question whether the trial court was compelled on the evidence presented to find certain money forfeitable. Put another way, was the City of Meridian entitled to a directed verdict by virtue of the fact that marked "buy" money was found intermingled with other…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. UHS-Qualicare, Inc. v. GULF COAST COM. HOSP., INC.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  2. McClendon v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Leatherwood v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Mrs. Winnie Gardner v. Oscar F. Wilkinson, Cross-Appellant v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. S & a REALTY COMPANY v. HilburnMississippi Supreme Court · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Galloway v. City of New AlbanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Evans v. City of AberdeenCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2005
  3. Cowan v. Mississippi Bureau of NarcoticsCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2009
  4. Gowdy v. GibsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  5. Four Thousand Eight Hundred One Dollars v. Lafayette County Metro Narcotics UnitCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API