ORION DRILLING COMPANY, LLC. v. EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ORION DRILLING COMPANY, LLC, ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. 16-1516 ) Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly v. ) ) Re: ECF No. 342 ) EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY, ) Defendant. ) OPINION AND ORDER KELLY, Magistrate Judge Pending before the Court is EQT’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Related Costs filed on behalf of Defendant EQT Production Company (“EQT”). ECF No. 342. EQT brings its motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d), and seeks recovery of attorneys’ fees and costs incurred and paid in defense of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Martin O. Washington v. Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, Martin WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Jane M. Wooldridge v. Marlene Industries Corporation and Russell Sportswear CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- McMullen v. KutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Pittsburgh & West Virginia RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.