Legal Opinion

Broadway-Flushing Homeowners' Ass'n v. Dilluvio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 11, 2012PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*615In August 2004 the defendants Anthony Dilluvio and Joseph M. Dilluvio (hereinafter together the appellants) purchased certain property in Flushing. The subject property is encumbered by a restrictive covenant, known as the Rickert Finlay Covenant (hereinafter the covenant), which provides, in relevant part, that “no fence except hedge or shrubbery will be permitted within 20 feet of the front line or side street line of any lot.” In May 2005 the appellants constructed a seven-foot high concrete and stucco wall to enclose a swimming pool they installed in the back of their property.

In October…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Northern Westchester Professional Park Associates v. Town of BedfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Society of Plastics Industry, Inc. v. County of SuffolkNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Douglaston Civic Ass'n v. GalvinNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. BRK Properties, Inc. v. Wagner Ziv Plumbing & Heating Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Broadway-Flushing Homeowners' Ass'n v. DilluvioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API