Frisa v. Irace
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*394The sole issue before us is whether the instant proceeding was properly commenced. The parties do not argue the merits.
The petition was not verified as mandated by Election Law § 16-116. The requirement is jurisdictional in nature and cannot be cured by amendment (see Matter of Goodman v Hayduk, 45 NY2d 804).
We further note that our determination will not disenfranchise any voters (cf. Matter of Rose v Smith, 220 AD2d 922). Smith, J.P., Goldstein, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Friedmann, J., dissents and votes to affirm the final order insofar as appealed from, with the following memorandum:…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- MATTER OF GOODMAN v. HaydukNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Rose v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Vaughn v. WithersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by1 opinion
- Frisa v. McCarthyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002