Legal Opinion

Frisa v. Irace

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 28, 2002PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*394The sole issue before us is whether the instant proceeding was properly commenced. The parties do not argue the merits.

The petition was not verified as mandated by Election Law § 16-116. The requirement is jurisdictional in nature and cannot be cured by amendment (see Matter of Goodman v Hayduk, 45 NY2d 804).

We further note that our determination will not disenfranchise any voters (cf. Matter of Rose v Smith, 220 AD2d 922). Smith, J.P., Goldstein, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Friedmann, J., dissents and votes to affirm the final order insofar as appealed from, with the following memorandum:…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MATTER OF GOODMAN v. HaydukNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Rose v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Vaughn v. WithersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Frisa v. McCarthyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API