Yocco v. Conroy
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
Action to recover damages for alleged wrongful diversion of water by defendant from plaintiff’s water-pipe, through which he conducted water to his land for the purpose of irrigation; and also to enjoin the defendant from diverting such water perpetually. The cause was tried by the court without a jury, and the judgment was in favor of the defendant. The plain*469tiff brings this appeal from the judgment on the judgment-roll, and contends that, upon the facts found by the court, the judgment should have been in his favor.
The material substance of the facts found is as follows: In…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Gould v. StaffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by8 opinions
- Paul v. Layne & Bowler Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Gould v. EatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- White v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Spring Valley Water Co. v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Walker v. LillingstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.