Coie v. Sadkin (In Re Sadkin)
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant Perkins Coie (“Perkins”), a law firm headquartered in California, appeals from the district court’s affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s order that allowed Gordon F. Sadkin’s claimed exemption of his wrongful garnishment cause of action and denied all relief requested by Perkins. We affirm the judgment of the district court.
I. BACKGROUND
Prior to events giving rise to this bankruptcy, Perkins represented the debtor Gordon F. Sadkin (“Sadkin”) in various real estate ventures, allegedly earning attorneys’ fees of more than $180,000. When a dispute over legal fees arose, Perkins filed a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Norman v. Apache Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Robert B. Sutton and Sutton Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Matter of Haber Oil Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Bass v. DenneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Sanchez v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co. (In Re Sanchez)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
- Stettner v. Smith (In Re IFS Financial Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- In Re Jack Kline Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- In Re BrownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.