Legal Opinion
Carter v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided October 8, 2004No. 2003-CA-001054-MRPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GUIDUGLI, Judge.
Arnold W. Carter has appealed from the portion of the Bourbon Circuit Court’s May 13, 2003, Opinion and Order denying his motion to intervene as a matter of right pursuant to CR 24.01. Carter had moved to intervene, both as a matter of right and permissibly, in a lawsuit filed by Jamie D. Smith against the Bourbon County Board of Education alleging violations of the Open Meetings Act. Because we have determined that the denial of the motion to intervene as a matter of right was immediately final and appealable and that the circuit court should have granted the motion,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Scotty Grubbs, the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Proposed Intervenor/appellant v. Stephen H. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Baker v. WebbKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- Monticello Electric Plant Board v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958
- Rosenbalm v. Commercial Bank of MiddlesboroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1992
- Ashland Public Library Board of Trustees v. ScottKentucky Supreme Court · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Polis v. Unknown Heirs of Jessie C. BlairCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2016
- Ipock v. IpockCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2013
- Wood v. Tax Ease Lien Investment 1, LLCCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2014
- A. H. v. W. R. L.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2016
- Chester Van Dyke of the Estate of Mattie Helenora Van Dyke v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.