Legal Opinion

Petition of Goldman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 10, 1890No. 107PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL BY PETITIONEE, EROM THE COUBT OE QUARTER SESSIONS OE ALLEGHENY COUNTY. No. 107 October Term 1890, Sup, Ct.; court below, No. 462 March Term 1890, Q. S. On February 4, 1890, David Goldman filed his application for a license to sell liquors at wholesale, under the act of May 24,1887, P. L. 194. The application appeared to be in due form and accompanied by the proper bond.

Read the full summary

APPEAL BY PETITIONEE, EROM THE COUBT OE QUARTER SESSIONS OE ALLEGHENY COUNTY. No. 107 October Term 1890, Sup, Ct.; court below, No. 462 March Term 1890, Q. S. On February 4, 1890, David Goldman filed his application for a license to sell liquors at wholesale, under the act of May 24,1887, P. L. 194. The application appeared to be in due form and accompanied by the proper bond. The record, as presented in the paper-books, did not set out any examination of witnesses, but copied in the “ Docket Entries ” was the following order: “ And now April 80, 1890, after hearing and upon due…

1Opinion of the Court

Pee. Curiam:

The record shows that the court below .refused to grant a wholesale license to appellant to sell liquors, for the reason that he did not possess the qualifications required by the act of assembly. This is sufficient.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson's LicenseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API