Legal Opinion

Martin v. Parkhill Pipeline, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 6, 1973No. 71 C 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BAUER, District Judge.

This cause comes on the motion of certain defendants to dismiss the instant complaint.

This is an action to recover damages for the breach of a collective bargaining agreement.

Jurisdiction is allegedly based on Section 301 of the Labor Management Relation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185(a).

The plaintiffs are trustees of the Midwest Operating Engineers Welfare Fund and trustees of the Midwest Operating Engineers Pension Trust Fund (“plaintiff trustees”). The plaintiffs are trustees pursuant to the terms and provisions of the Agreement and Declaration of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Charles Baker v. Fleet Maintenance, Incorporated and Sears, Roebuck and Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  2. United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Etc., (Plaintiffs) v. Mesker Bros. Industries, Inc., (Defendants)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  3. Upholsterers' International Union Of North America, Afl-Cio v. The American Pad & Textile CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  4. Williams v. Wisconsin Barge Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  5. United Mine Workers of America v. RonccoDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1964

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jane Loss v. Rayford T. BlankenshipCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  2. Trustees of the Colorado Pipe Industry Employee Benefit Funds v. Colorado Springs Plumbing & Heating Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API