Legal Opinion

North River Ins. Co. of New York v. Daniel

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 14, 1937No. 1829PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALEXANDER, Justice.

This suit was brought by C. R. Daniel against the insurance company to recover on a fire insurance policy. Judgment was for plaintiff, and the defendant appealed.

The appellant’s principal defense was that appellee Daniel had employed one Herbert Lee Smith to burn the building. Appellant offered in evidence the written ex parte confession of the said Herbert Lee Smith, in which he admitted forming a conspiracy with Daniel to burn the building for $25 and that later he set fire to and burned the building. Appellant also offered to prove that certain footprints found near the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Waco Drug Co. v. HensleyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. Reliance Ins. Co. v. SmithTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. American Rio Grande Land & Irr. Co. v. BellmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Garcia v. VolpeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Universal Commodities, Inc. v. WeedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  2. City of Corpus Christi v. GreggCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  3. Terrell v. OlsenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Caufield v. El Paso Times, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  5. Utica National Insurance Co. of Texas v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API