Legal Opinion

Philm Corp. v. Washington Township

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 16, 1994No. 976 C.D. 1993Published

1Opinion of the Court

162 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 126 (1994)

638 A.2d 388

PHILM CORPORATION, Appellant,

v.

WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP; Stanley J. Margle III, Esq.; and Stanley M. Lysek, Zoning Officer and Jill C. Corley and Charles R. Rissmiller.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued December 13, 1993.

Decided February 16, 1994.

Reargument Denied March 29, 1994.

Anthony J. Martino, for appellant.

David J. Ceraul, for appellees.

Before McGINLEY and PELLEGRINI, JJ., and NARICK, Senior Judge.

NARICK, Senior Judge.

Before us is an appeal by Philm Corporation (Philm) from a judgment entered in favor of Washington Township, Stanley J.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hanna v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Township of Chartiers v. William H. Martin, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Limley v. Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Mignatti AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Gustin v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API