Legal Opinion

Stringer v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 27, 2009No. 49A02-0806-CR-536PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant-Defendant, Emmanuel Stringer (Stringer), appeals his conviction for Count I, Part I, auto theft, a Class D felony, Ind.Code § 35-43-4-2.5, and Part II, auto theft, a Class C felony, I.C. § 35-43-4-2.5; and Count II, operating never having received a license, a Class C misdemeanor, I.C. § 9-24-18-1.

We affirm.

ISSUE

Stringer raises one issue on appeal, which we restate as follows: Whether the trial court erred when it accepted Stringer’s counsel’s stipulation to a prior conviction which established the basis for the enhanced offense of auto theft…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Tumulty v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Gann v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Vanzandt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adam Morris v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Jacquez I. Lewis v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. James L. Graham v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Stringer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API