Legal Opinion

Popham v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 10, 1921No. 1228PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarper, C. J.

F. W. Popham and Mrs. Elizabeth Popham prosecute this action against C. G. Wright for damages and for a mandatory injunction, and for cause of action allege that they are the present owners of the “U pasture,” containing 114 sections owned and under lease by them, fenced, and used by them for pasturing cattle and horses; that on the 4th day of August, 1919, defendant entered into a contract with the then executors of the estate of A1 Popham, deceased, to pasture certain cattle and horses in said pasture until May 1,1920, at a charge of .20 cents per head per month; that by said contract…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lazarus v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Clifton & Wadkins v. Royse Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  3. Knight v. DurhamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Strait Bros. v. ChaneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Perry v. StringfellowTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Perry v. String FellowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Ornelas v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API