Legal Opinion · Dissent

Peluso v. Janice Taxi Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 19, 2010Published

1Dissent

Friedman, J.P., and Nardelli, J.,

dissent in a memorandum by Nardelli, J., as follows: Since I believe that plaintiff failed to meet her burden of demonstrating the existence of factual issues as to whether her injuries were the result of a preexisting condition, and thus as to whether she incurred a serious injury, I would reverse and dismiss the complaint.

In moving for summary judgment, defendants Janice Taxi Co. and Nicholas Caamo, the owner and driver, respectively, of the taxicab which was involved in a collision with the vehicle in which plaintiff was driving, offered, inter alia, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pommells v. PerezNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Eichinger v. Jone Cab Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Chong Sim Kim v. AmayaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API