Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Stephens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 3, 1988Published

1DissentLawrence, J.

I find no reason for disturbing the hearing court’s determination, which was based upon its acceptance of the testimony of the defendants’ witnesses, to the effect that there was a clear "indication that the police had engaged in improper conduct [prior to the time that the actual lineups were set up and viewed by the complainant, which was] calculated to influence the [complainant’s] identification of the defendant^]” (cf., People v Baity, 139 AD2d 521, 522). As noted by the majority, Sergeant Steele did not recall whether on the night of the lineups, the complainant’s mother had accompanied…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. RileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. People v. BaityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API