Legal Opinion

Town of Springfield, Vermont v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, and the Employers Mutual and Casualty Company

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 27, 1986No. 1052, Docket 84-7976PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEARSE, Circuit Judge:

Defendant The Employers Mutual and Casualty Company (“EMC”) appeals from so much of a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Vermont, James S. Holden, Judge, entered in this diversity action, as declared EMC contractually obligated to defend plaintiff Town of Springfield, Vermont (the “Town”), and its officials, and to satisfy any judgment that might be rendered against the Town in connection with certain litigation brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1982), involving an alleged unconstitutional taking of property. On appeal, EMC contends…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. Glens Falls Insurance Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  2. Noyes v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
  3. AMERICAN FIDELITY COMPANY v. ElkinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
  4. Kusserow v. Blue Cross-Blue Shield PlanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. International Insurance v. City of Chicago HeightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  2. Town of East Haven v. Allied World Insurance Company, et alDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API