Legal Opinion

Fair Housing Council of Orange County, Inc. v. Ayres

District Court, C.D. California

Decided June 16, 1994No. SACV 93-149-GLT[SH]PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

TAYLOR, District Judge.

This case interprets the 1988 amendments to the federal Fair Housing Act, and its provision protecting familial status, 42 U.S.C. § 3604(b). The court holds that a showing of discriminatory intent is not necessary for plaintiffs to state a prima facie case of housing discrimination based on familial status. The court also holds that, to rebut the case, a defendant must show that the policy in question is the least restrictive means to achieve a compelling business purpose.

I. BACKGROUND

Las Brisas Apartments is a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Trafficante v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp., Northwest Opportunity Center and Eluteria D. Maldonado, Intervening v. Village of Arlington HeightsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  3. Keith v. VolpeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. United States of America, Appellant-Appellee v. City of Black Jack, Missouri, Appellee-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  5. Smith v. Town of ClarktonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fair Housing Congress v. WeberDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1997
  2. Llanos v. Estate of CoehloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1998
  3. Pack v. FORT WASHINGTON IIDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
  4. United States v. Tropic Seas, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1995
  5. Iniestra v. Cliff Warren Investments, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API