Legal Opinion
Just In-Materials Designs, Ltd. v. I.T.A.D. Associates, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 28, 1984PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
This is not an instance of a transaction involving the exchange of different contract forms. Here Associated Textile Brokers Co., acting, as the Appellate Division properly concluded, as broker for both buyer and seller, served as intermediary for the negotiations between them and then sent to each a memorandum sale note evidencing the agreement between them, which included a broad clause for arbitration pursuant to the rules of the General Arbitration Council of the Textile Industry. Defendant…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Matter of HuxleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
3Cited by5 opinions
- National City Golf Finance v. Higher Ground Country Club Management Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Graniteville Co. v. Star Knits of California, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Astor Chocolate Corp. v. Mikroverk Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- National Agricultural Commodities, Inc. v. International Commodities Export Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- JUST IN-MATERIALS DESIGNS, LTD. v. ITAD Assocs., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984