Legal Opinion

Jones v. Heckler

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 1, 1985No. 84-1598PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

This three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court dismissing the plaintiff’s action challenging the suspension of his Social Security disability benefits while he is in prison. The plaintiff contends on appeal that 42 U.S.C. § 423(f) (the predecessor to 42 U.S.C. § 402(x)), the statute which mandated the suspension of benefits, is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Buccheri-Bianca v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  3. Hopper v. SchweikerDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1984

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tom Wiley v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, H.H.SCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  2. State v. AnthonyAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Matter of Injury to SperaWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Davis v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
  5. Casalvera v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API