Legal Opinion

Chrestensen v. Harms

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1917No. File No. 3877PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from1 Circuit Court, Brown County. Hon. Thomas Iy. Bouck, Judge. Upon rehearing.

1Opinion of the CourtFoeley, J.

This case was before the court for determination at a.former term, and will be found reported in 38 S. D. 360, 161 N. W. 343, and reference is made to. said report for a statement of the case. Counsel, in their argument on rehearing, question the correctness of the statement of facts contained in the opinion as above reported', but, upon a re-examination of the evidence as s'et forth in the printed briefs, we are fully satisfied with the statement contained1 in our former opinion.

[1] We are also satisfied with the conclusion reached relative to the instructions of the court, though perhaps we…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chrestenson v. HarmsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bennett v. MurdySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API