Bryant v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENTON, J.
Dennis Wayne Bryant seeks reversal of his convictions of breaking and entering with intent to abduct and abduction. Bryant argues that the victim’s identification testimony should have been suppressed because it was based on an unnecessarily suggestive pre-trial photographic identification. We conclude that the victim’s photographic identification possessed independent features of reliability sufficient to overcome the corrupting effect of the suggestive identification procedure. We therefore affirm the convictions.
We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Higginbotham v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
- United States v. James E. ArringtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hodges v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
- Jack Randall Young v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2019
- Oliva v. HedgpethDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Taylor v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008
- David Smith v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.