Marker v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.
The practice indulged in the trial of this case in the court 'below, in the reservation of exceptions to the rulings of the court, entails unnecessary labor and consumes much time of the court below, as well as of this court. The law now is, where there is an objection to a question propounded to a witness in the trial of any cause, and the objection is overruled and exception reserved, it shall not toe necessary to make a motion to exclude the answer of the witness in order to put the court in error on his rulings on such objection. Gen. Acts of Alabama 1927, pp. 636, 637. The observance of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Batson v. State Ex Rel. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Hymes v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Dorgan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Goard v. BranscomCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. HortonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- Hulsey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
- Marker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932