Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mott v. Mott

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 17, 1982No. 1789Published

1DissentSpaeth, Judge

The majority acknowledges that a spouse in a divorce action can rebut the presumption of desertion that arises from the separation of the parties for the statutory period by showing that the other spouse consented to the separation. Slip op. at 2. See Gureghian v. Gureghian, 206 Pa.Super. 411, 213 A.2d 218 (1965); Burt v. Burt, 194 Pa.Super. 34, 166 A.2d 85 (1960). I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that appellant deserted her husband because I believe that appellant succeeded in establishing that her husband consented to her departure from their home.

Appellant testified without…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burt v. BurtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Gureghian v. GureghianSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API