Legal Opinion

David v. David

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1890Published

Appeal from special term, New York county. A partition suit brought by Albert L. David against Adelaide David, Charles F. David, and Mary O’Gorman David. Defendant Charles F. David appeals from the interlocutory judgment directing a sale of the property.

1Opinion of the CourtDaniels, J.

The action has been brought to partition the property described in the complaint. It is bounded by the northerly side of "Vesey street, 77 feet 3 inches; and by a line running northerly from Yesey street 49 feet and 11 inches, to a line parallel to Yesey street; and then, by a line extending to Washington street, for a distance of 96 feet and 2£ inches; and on the easterly side of Washington street about 53 feet. The land has been improved by erecting thereon four different buildings, one fronting on Washington street, the next upon Washington and Yesey streets, and the other two upon Yesey…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
  2. Clason v. ClasonNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
  3. Van Arsdale v. DrakeNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  4. Haywood v. JudsonNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  5. Orman v. PhelpsNew York Supreme Court · 1850

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API