Legal Opinion

Hammond v. Warfield

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 15, 1806PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the General Court. Ejectment for a tract of land called Part of Wood’s Indo sure, lying in Frederick county, containing 2286 acres. The defendant, (now appellee,) took defence on warrant, under the general issue plea, for a. tract of land called The Resurvey on Hobson’s Choice. i.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the General Court. Ejectment for a tract of land called Part of Wood’s Indo sure, lying in Frederick county, containing 2286 acres. The defendant, (now appellee,) took defence on warrant, under the general issue plea, for a. tract of land called The Resurvey on Hobson’s Choice. i. At the trial at May term 1803, the defendant produced the honourable Alexander Conlee llamón, Chancellor, and judge of the 'land office for the western shoi'p, and jproposed to him the following question, to wits “If a certificate on a warrant of résúrvey is returned, in which vacant land Is included,…

1Opinion of the Court

The Court,

at this term, concurred in the opinions, pronounced by the General Court in the several bills of fexceptions taken bn the part of the plaintiff below.

ÍUÍKJM.ENT APEIRMEB»

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Itasca Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  2. Stallings v. Ruby's LesseeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1867
  3. Cunningham v. BrowningHigh Court of Chancery of Maryland · 1827
  4. Stallman v. KimberlyNew York Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API