Legal Opinion

Bowers v. Yancey

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1920No. 7 Div. 85Published

Appeal from Circuit Court,- De Kalb County; W. W. Haralson, Judge. Ejectment by W. J. Yancey against B. Bowers, alias, etc. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. It was agreed that T. J. Duffey owned the land in question, and each party traced to him as the common source of title. Plaintiff claimed by deed from Duffey to H. Bowers, and from H. Bowers to himself.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Circuit Court,- De Kalb County; W. W. Haralson, Judge. Ejectment by W. J. Yancey against B. Bowers, alias, etc. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. It was agreed that T. J. Duffey owned the land in question, and each party traced to him as the common source of title. Plaintiff claimed by deed from Duffey to H. Bowers, and from H. Bowers to himself. Defendant claimed that before Duffey executed the deed to H. Bowers he contracted .with defendant to give him the land in consideration that defendant would look after him and care for him; that he put defendant in…

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

Statutory action of ejectment by appellee against appellant. The fact that appellant was in possession holding adversely did not affect the admissibility or probative force of the deeds under which appellee showed^ title. Code, § 3839; Nichols v. Nichols, 179 Ala. 611, 60 South. 855; (Reichert v. Sheip, 85 South. 267, The cases cited by appellant arose prior to the change in the statute law now appearing in the section of the Code supra.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and BROWN, JJ., concur.

<S=>For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reichert v. Jerome H. Sheip, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Nichols v. NicholsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API