Heyn v. Ohman
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Krysor, J. cited: Real v. Hollister, 20 Neb., 112; Mills v. Rioe, 3 Neb., 85; Rawle, Covenants, 181, 308; Sedgwick v. Hollenback, 7 Johns. [N. Y.], 380; Blanchard v. Hoxie, 34 Me., 378; Wait v. Maxwell, 4 Pick. [Mass.], 87. cited: West v. Bine, 4 Wash. [U. S. C. C.], 691; Ludlow v. McBride, 3 O., 231; Ward v. McIntosh, 12 O. St., 240; Rdbinoe v. Doe, 6 Blackf. [Ind.], 85; Hill v. Draper, 10 Barb. [N. Y.],…
Read the full summary
Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Krysor, J. cited: Real v. Hollister, 20 Neb., 112; Mills v. Rioe, 3 Neb., 85; Rawle, Covenants, 181, 308; Sedgwick v. Hollenback, 7 Johns. [N. Y.], 380; Blanchard v. Hoxie, 34 Me., 378; Wait v. Maxwell, 4 Pick. [Mass.], 87. cited: West v. Bine, 4 Wash. [U. S. C. C.], 691; Ludlow v. McBride, 3 O., 231; Ward v. McIntosh, 12 O. St., 240; Rdbinoe v. Doe, 6 Blackf. [Ind.], 85; Hill v. Draper, 10 Barb. [N. Y.], 454; Jones v. Nunn, 12 Ga., 469; Nagel v. Macy, 9 Cal., 426; Shumway v. Phillips, 22 Pa. St., 151; Jones v. Bland, 112 Pa.…
1Opinion of the Court
Ryan, C.
The defendant in error recovered judgment against the plaintiff in error in the district court of Douglas county for the sum of $975 and costs, on account of breaches of covenants of warranty contained in a deed made in 1887 by plaintiff in error to defendant in error. The consideration recited in the aforesaid conveyance was the exact sum for which judgment was rendered. On the trial there was uncontradicted evidence that one Mary K. Lund, from the year 1885 up to the time of trial, had held undisputed possession of the premises described in the deed above referred to; that she had…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Brown v. FeaginsNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by2 opinions
- East Canyon Land & Stock Co. v. Davis & Weber Counties Canal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1925
- Lampkin v. LongSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956