In re City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal, by J. Sergeant Cram and J.. Woodward Haven, as trustees, etc., of Henry A. Cram, deceased, from an- order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 17th day of ■ July, 1902, confirming the report' and supplemental report, of- commissioners of estimate and assessment. . .
1Opinion of the Court
Hatch, J.:
The regularity of the proceedings in this matter is not questioned, nór is the city interested. The point involved is the validity of the award made to Philip Dietrich for the value of a leasehold interest in certain premises affected by the widening of One Hundred and *29Tenth street. Henry A. Cram was the owner of the premises involved during his lifetime. He died, leaving a last will and testament, which was duly admitted to probate in the county of Yew York on the 1st day of May, 1894. He left him surviving a widow and five children, one of whom, Harry Spencer Cram, died in March,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Manice v. . ManiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Roseboom v. . RoseboomNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Ahern v. . SteeleNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Cuthbert v. . ChauvetNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Weeks v. . WeeksNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Weir v. BarkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- 39 Cortlandt Street Corp. v. LambertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- South End Warehouse Co. v. LaveryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Aimone Manufacturing Co. v. SchultzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Bachia v. PiepenbrinkNew York Supreme Court · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.