Legal Opinion
Mocarski v. Palmer
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 18, 1945PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for the death of his son, caused by a locomotive of the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, represented by the defendant trustees. The plaintiff had a verdict and the defendants have appealed from the denial of the motion to set it aside and from the judgment. The jury could reasonably have found these facts: The accident occurred at a point on the railroad’s main line a short distance west of its Stamford station at about 3 o’clock in the afternoon of September 14, 1943. At this place, there are four parallel tracks which…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pomponio v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Nolan v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
- Dyson v. New York & New England RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
- Cote v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Elliott v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mickel v. New England Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Marchand v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Carbone v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1946
- Zionts v. Fleet Bank of Connecticut, No. Cv92 0518468s (Sep. 15, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994