Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Office of Professional Conduct

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 2017No. Case No. 20150948PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice Durrant,

opinion of the Court:

Introduction

¶ 1 Petitioner Stacey Austin Johnson appeals from an attorney discipline order suspending him from the practice of law. We conclude that we lack jurisdiction because Mr. Johnson failed to timely appeal the district court’s order, which was final under Utah Rules of Civil Procedure 54 and 58A. We therefore do not consider his appeal on the merits.

¶2 Following a formal disciplinary proceeding under rule 14-511 of the Rules of Lawyer Discipline and Disability (RLDD), the district court entered its “Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Giusti v. Sterling Wentworth Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Code v. Utah Department of HealthUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Central Utah Water Conservancy District v. KingUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Butler v. Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsUtah Supreme Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adoption B.B. v. R.K.B.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Christensen v. Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API