George W. Mathias v. Michael M. Mihm
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SYKES, Circuit Judge.. This mandamus petition raises a question of first impression in this circuit: Does ERISA’s venue provision, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e)(2), preclude enforcement of a forum-selection clause .in an employee-benefits plan? - George Mathias,.- the ■ plan beneficiary and mandamus petitioner here, argues that it does; the Secretary of Labor, as amicus curiae,, supports that interpretation. The respondent health plans argue that § 1132(e)(2) is permissive only and does not invalidate a forum-selection clause contained in plan documents.
Only one circuit has addressed this question. The…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Ryze Claims Solutions, LLC v. Jane Magnus-StinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. ReedDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2018
- Brady v. Sperian Energy CorporationDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2019
- Brady v. Sperian Energy CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- Cherry A. Haywood v. ComTec Information SystemsDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2025
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.