Legal Opinion

George W. Mathias v. Michael M. Mihm

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 10, 2017No. 16-3808PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SYKES, Circuit Judge.. This mandamus petition raises a question of first impression in this circuit: Does ERISA’s venue provision, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e)(2), preclude enforcement of a forum-selection clause .in an employee-benefits plan? - George Mathias,.- the ■ plan beneficiary and mandamus petitioner here, argues that it does; the Secretary of Labor, as amicus curiae,, supports that interpretation. The respondent health plans argue that § 1132(e)(2) is permissive only and does not invalidate a forum-selection clause contained in plan documents.

Only one circuit has addressed this question. The…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Ryze Claims Solutions, LLC v. Jane Magnus-StinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. ReedDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2018
  3. Brady v. Sperian Energy CorporationDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2019
  4. Brady v. Sperian Energy CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  5. Cherry A. Haywood v. ComTec Information SystemsDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2025

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API