Legal Opinion

United States v. Travis Stanley Hamilton

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 10, 1971No. 30945PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal from conviction for possession of counterfeit bills in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 472, appellant raises numerous issues, all of which we have considered.

The court did not err in refusing defendant’s requested charge on entrapment. Pierce v. United States, 414 F.2d 163 (5th Cir.1969).

Appellant was not given a preliminary hearing, although there is evidence that he requested one, but subsequently he was indicted by the grand jury. This was not reversible error. United States v. Coley and Scogin, 441 F.2d 1299 (5th Cir., 1971).

Probable cause for appellant’s arrest without a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. William Clayton Pierce v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Pryor v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1970
  3. United States v. Lennard Coley and Paul Dabney Scogin, No. 30139 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part ICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. James Edward Kennedy v. Harold J. Cardwell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. Al TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. Rush v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1974
  4. United States v. Joseph Chrzanowski, in No. 73-1591, and Alex Chrzanowski. Appeal of Alex Chrzanowski, in No. 73-1592Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  5. Commonwealth v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API