Legal Opinion · Dissent

Madsen v. Larsen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1974No. 13559Published

1DissentCallister, Chief Justice

(dissenting)-

I respectfully dissent. At the hearing on plaintiff’s motion, his counsel stated that the only issue was Mr. Madsen’s identity. Plaintiff’s counsel elaborated by stating that the governor’s warrant referred to Dennis Madsen with no middle name, no address, and no other means of identification. Plaintiff’s counsel represented that there were four or five other Dennis Mad-sens in the Salt Lake and northern Utah area. Based on the foregoing, plaintiff’s counsel urged that the papers and the warrant were insufficient on their face to support the arrest and return of Dennis Mad-sen.

Pla…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The PEOPLE EX REL. JAMES v. LynchIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Krutka v. BryerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  3. Scott v. BecksteadUtah Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Chambers v. SimsUtah Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Moreaux v. FerrinUtah Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API