Legal Opinion

Perel v. Brannan

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 23, 2004No. Record 031291PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lemons

In this appeal, we consider the enforcement of certain restrictive covenants applying to a lot in a residential subdivision, and the remedies for breach of these covenants.

I. Facts and Proceedings Below

In 1998, Locke Lane, L.C. (“Locke Lane”) purchased a tract of land from the Science Museum of Virginia Foundation, Inc. and Science Museum Foundation Real Estate, L.L.C. (collectively, the “Science Museum”) for the purpose of developing a residential subdivi sion named “River Locke.” In the summer of 1998, Locke Lane and the Science Museum jointly requested a special use permit and approval of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wilson v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  2. Ted Lansing Supply Co. v. Royal Aluminum & Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1981
  3. Mid-State Equipment Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  4. Cheatham v. TaylorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
  5. Bond v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Little v. CookeSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  2. In re A2P SMS Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  3. Wetlands Am. Trust, Inc. v. White Cloud Nine Ventures, L.P.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2016
  4. Barris v. Keswick Homes, LLCSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004
  5. J. William Winney, Jr. v. Michael Troy JerupWyoming Supreme Court · 2023

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API