Legal Opinion
William M. Belcher v. Catherine Kroczek, D.D.S.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 9, 2014No. 45A03-1311-CT-436PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Chief Judge.
Case Summary
Indiana Trial Rule 75(A) allows a case to be filed in any county in Indiana. In this case, Catherine Kroezek, a Lake County dentist, filed suit against William W. Bel-cher in Lake County under Trial Rule 75(A)(2). Belcher later filed a motion to transfer venue, and a dispute arose over whether Dr. Kroezek had properly established preferred venue in Lake County.
We conclude that preferred venue does not lie in Lake County. In relevant part, Trial Rule 75(A)(2) provides that preferred venue may lie in the county where the chattels at issue are located. When…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jay Myoung Yoon v. Sunsook YoonIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Bostic v. House of James, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Meridian Mutual Insurance Co. v. HarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- R & D Transport, Inc. v. A.H.Indiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Phillips v. ScalfIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kelly Bagsby and Aaron Bagsby v. Riley T. SnedekerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Casimir R Starsiak, Jr. v. Janette T StarsiakIndiana Court of Appeals · 2024
- Floyd Freeman, Individually, and Clover Homes, Inc. v. Timberland Home Center, Inc., and Tracy Nash and Robbyn Nash, and V-Live General Services, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2020
- Keystone Cooperative, Inc. v. Brock Fraschet. alIndiana Court of Appeals · 2025
- Mary Kem v. Reggie SpencerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.