State v. Doctor
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Toal, Justice:
The appellant, Doctor, was convicted of armed robbery. The issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in excluding out-of-court statements made against the declarant’s penal interest offered to exculpate the accused. We reverse.
FACTS
At trial the victim and sole eyewitness testified Doctor, accompanied by two other boys, approached him in a shopping mall parking lot and demanded his car keys. According to the victim, when he refused Doctor pointed a gun to his head. The victim then surrendered his keys and the three boys drove away in the car. The car was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Christiansen v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- State v. RivasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- McClain v. Anderson Free PressSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. McDonaldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Riddle v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- State v. HughesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.