Legal Opinion

Goad v. Mister Softee of the Mississippi Valley, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 1964No. 31454PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADY, Commissioner.

This appeal arises out of proceedings wherein the respondents sought an injunction to prevent the appellants from obtaining a repossessed title to a truck. The issue presented for our ruling does not deal with the propriety of the trial court’s action in refusing to grant the relief requested, and accordingly, our statement of the factual situation will be very brief. The parties will hereafter be referred to by their designation in the trial court.

The plaintiffs had purchased a “Mister Softee” truck from the corporate defendant. They had paid $4,500.00 down and had given…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cohn v. LehmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  2. Herbig v. HerbigMissouri Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. In Re SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Jegglin v. OrrMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. J.J. Newberry Co. v. Baker, Renschen, Newton, Etc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Citizens for Ground Water Protection v. PorterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Hoevelman v. Reorganized School District R2 of Crawford CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Eickelmann v. EickelmannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Lowry v. Northwestern Savings & Loan Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. CITIZENS FOR GR. WATER PROTECTION v. PorterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API