Orient S. S. Co. v. Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.
Based principally upon the alleged error of the court below in finding that the appellant’s motorship was unseaworthy and that due diligence had not been exercised in that regard, this is an appeal in an admiralty cargo damage suit from an interlocutory decree in favor of the libelant appellee.
The appellee was the purchaser and consignee of a shipment of ammophos fertilizer, part of which was damaged by sea water while on board the appellant’s motorship Lidien in transportation from New York to Japan.
There was no trial or oral argument in the lower court. The entire…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BehymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- The SouthwarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- International Navigation Co. v. Farr & Bailey Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- The WildcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- May v. Hamburg-Amerikanische Packetfahrt AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- The IndienCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934