Legal Opinion

State v. Houghtaling

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 1, 1965No. 34363PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

181 So.2d 636 (1965)

The STATE of Florida, Petitioner and Cross Respondent,

v.

Francis S. HOUGHTALING, Lawrence M. Ripley, Nestor E. Houghtaling, Respondents.

No. 34363.

Supreme Court of Florida.

December 1, 1965.

Rehearing Denied February 1, 1966.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Arden Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richard E. Gerstein, State's Atty. and Joseph Durant, Asst. State's Atty., for petitioner and cross-respondent.

Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender and Phillip A. Hubbart, Asst. Public Defender, for respondents and cross-petitioner.

O'CONNELL, Justice.

Respondents were informed against under two…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Cohen v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
  3. State v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  4. State v. HoughtalingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cyril M. HUDAK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ECONOMIC RESEARCH ANALYSTS, INC., and Richard W. McIntyre, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. Gordon Jones and Laura Jones v. John H. Childers and Talent Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  3. State v. OxxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Mortgage Corp.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1979
  5. Al Ainsworth v. Sam SkurnickCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API