Keith v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
BAIRD, Judge.
Appellant signed as surety on a bail bond for a defendant charged with a felony. After the principal failed to appear, the bond was forfeited and judgment entered against appellant. On appeal, appellant contended that Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 22.16 required a waiting period of 18 months before a final judgment could be entered, thus the judgment was premature. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Keith v. State, 760 S.W.2d 746 (Tex.App—Ft. Worth, 1988). We granted appellant’s petition to decide whether a bail bond is a…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cardenas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
- Keith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rolando v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
- Dingman v. HarvellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
- Dees v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
- Castaneda v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Castaneda v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.