Legal Opinion

Mitchell Realty Group, LLC v. Holt

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 27, 2004No. A03A1912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Presiding Judge.

Mitchell Realty Group, LLC (“Mitchell”) sued William Holt for a brokerage commission allegedly owed under a real estate purchase and sale agreement. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Following a hearing, the trial court granted Holt’s motion and denied Mitchell’s motion. Mitchell appeals, and for reasons that follow, we affirm.

Summary judgment is appropriate when the evidence, construed most favorably to the non-moving party, demonstrates that no genuine issues of material fact remain and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burns v. DeesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  2. Lifestyle Family, L.P. v. Lawyers Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  3. Steinemann v. Vaughn & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. Carterosa, Ltd. v. General Star Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Atlanta Metallic Casket Co. v. Mosby Truck Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chong v. REEBAA CONST. CO., INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  2. Harrouk v. FiermanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Campbell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. PARGAR, LLC v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API