Legal Opinion

Mabardy v. Campo

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 4, 1962PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

These are two actions of tort. In one, the plaintiff seeks to recover against R. V. Campo, V. Campo, and Joseph Civiello, doing business as Pilgrim Furniture Mfg. Co., hereinafter called the tenants. In the other, recovery is sought against Anthony Alving, Nathan Bozen, and Arthur J. McG-onagle, hereinafter called the landlords.

The evidence was as follows: The landlords were the owners of a building located at 16 Harcourt Street, Boston. The tenants occupied a portion of the third floor of that building. For approximately ten years the plaintiff had from time to time come to 16 Harcourt…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McNicholas v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. Melvin v. Pennsylvania Steel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  3. Fitchburg Gas and Electric Light Co. v. Samuel Evans Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  4. Lowner v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  5. Schopen v. RandoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Haller v. E. A. Spry & Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1970
  2. Mills v. Stop & Shop, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1972
  3. Fichtner v. SchneiderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  4. Lameiras v. CoreyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  5. St. Pierre v. Savage ArmsMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API