Legal Opinion

Sklar v. Kahle

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 7, 1944No. 35909PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FOURNET, Justice.

The plaintiff, Sam Sklar, alleging that he and the defendant, Dr. P. J. Kahle, are the co-owners of a certain producing oil, gas, and mineral lease (as well as certain drilling and operating machinery and equipment on the premises) which is being operated by them as a joint adventure or co-partnership, instituted this suit to have the partnership liquidated and its- assets partitioned on the ground that the defendant has failed and refused to pay his share of the expenses of operation in accordance with their agreement, ruling Dr. Kahle to show cause why a receiver should not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. Ramsey & DunlapSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  2. Sklar v. KahleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Anderson v. MerrimanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API