Legal Opinion

McCall v. Owens

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 9, 1991PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANKS, Judge.

In these cases consolidated for trial, defendants First Tennessee Bank, Ron Beverly and East Tennessee Auto Recovery Corporation have appealed jury verdicts for compensatory and punitive damages rendered in favor of the plaintiff. We reverse the trial court judgments on the basis of inconsistent verdicts as to liability and damages.

Plaintiff purchased a 1979 Ford Pinto from Garner Sams Ford on May 21, 1979 and financed the purchase through a loan from the United American Bank. The installment sales contract provided in part:

INSURANCE: Obligor shall purchase and maintain…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lawrence Ex Rel. Powell v. StanfordTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  2. General Finance Corp. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Huckeby v. SpanglerTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Rushing v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Milliken v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. PNC Multifamily Capital Institutional Fund XXVI Limited Partnership v. Bluff City Community Development CorporationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012
  2. Massachusetts Bay Insurance v. Vic Koenig Leasing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  3. MBank El Paso, N.A. v. SanchezTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. RyanOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Lowe v. Surpas Resource Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API