Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 3, 1989No. 87-671PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, Justice.

This case involves a boundary line dispute between Cludie Bowen • and Louise Mitchell. Following a nonjury trial, the judge established the boundary line in accordance with a survey done by Mitchell’s surveyor, James. E. Barry, Sr. Bowen appeals, arguing that the line should have been set in accordance with a survey done by Bobby Bailey.

We have previously written:

“It is well settled that:
“ ‘In a case tried ore tenus, there is a presumption of correctness and the trial court’s findings will not be disturbed unless they are palpably wrong, without supporting evidence or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thomas v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  2. Wallace v. PutmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Gertz v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Silverman v. Charmac, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. Gulledge v. Frosty Land Foods Intern., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dozier v. HubbertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API